Technology and innovation

AI recreates what people see with less brain-scan data

An AI system developed at Israel’s Weizmann Institute of Science has reconstructed detailed pictures of what people were viewing from their brain scans. Researchers say it preserves colour, layout and content better than earlier methods.

Called Brain-IT, it also needs much less recorded data from a new participant. The team reports that one hour of scans was enough to match results achieved by other methods trained on 40 hours of recordings.

The researchers started with a public dataset from eight volunteers who viewed thousands of images inside a functional MRI scanner, which tracks brain activity through changes in blood flow and oxygen. They then trained another AI model to predict the brain activity an image would produce. Those simulated scans supplied extra training material without requiring people to spend more hours in the machine.

The reconstructed scenes included baseball games, birds and beaches. But the system still makes mistakes: in one example, it turned a dog in a bathtub into a goat in a bathtub.

For now, this remains a laboratory tool requiring an MRI scanner and a willing participant. Its demonstrated achievement is reconstructing images people are looking at, not reading their private thoughts, memories or dreams.

Sources

  1. The Telegraph'Mind-reading AI tool' can picture what you are thinking
  2. CNETThis 'Mind-Reading' AI Is a Wiz at Figuring Out What You See - CNET
  3. FuturismNew AI Can Figure Out What You're Thinking About From a Brain Scan

Reporting notes

Where this came from

Weizmann Institute of Science

The Telegraph explicitly says the Weizmann Institute of Science released the reconstructed images. CNET identifies the institute's research and repeatedly quotes Irani's statement.

MIT Technology Review

CNET explicitly uses 'according to MIT Technology Review' and identifies an interview conducted by MIT Technology Review. No earlier reporting origin for those passages is established.

MIT Tech Review

Futurism attributes Tommy Sprague's comments to MIT Tech Review and credits the same publication, also shortened to MIT Tech and MIT Review, for technical details, Irani's failure example and Marcello Ienca's commentary.