technology and innovation

Treated sanitation waste boosts concrete’s bending strength by 42%

A concrete mix in which biochar made from treated faecal sludge replaced 10% of the cement became notably stronger than conventional concrete in laboratory tests. After 91 days of curing, it showed a 21% increase in compressive strength, or resistance to crushing, and a 42% increase in flexural strength, which reflects resistance to bending and cracking.

Researchers from Manipal University Jaipur and Louisiana Tech University produced the biochar from faecal sludge collected at a treatment plant in Warangal, Telangana. The sludge was dried, heated at 350°C to 450°C with limited oxygen, then ground and sieved. It was not untreated waste added directly to the mix.

Replacing 5% of cement also improved performance after 91 days, with average gains of 20% in compressive strength and 36% in flexural strength. The porous biochar may act as a tiny water reservoir, gradually supporting cement hydration. Its silica content and fine particles may also help create and pack strength-giving compounds.

The benefit had limits. At 15% replacement, strength declined, while higher biochar levels made fresh concrete less workable. Because the study used sludge from one plant, material from other regions and long-term durability under harsh conditions still need testing. A planned leaching analysis must also assess whether potentially toxic contaminants remain safely contained. Even so, the best-performing mixes point to a productive use for sanitation waste that could reduce demand for emissions-intensive cement.

Sources

  1. India TodayScientists turn human poop into concrete and it's surprisingly 42% stronger
  2. Economic TimesIndian scientists develop a new concrete using human waste to make it significantly stronger than conventional cement
  3. Asianet News Network Pvt LtdHuman Waste Could Make Concrete 42% Stronger, Study Finds

Reporting notes

Where this came from

Scientific Reports study

India Today and Economic Times state that the results were published in Scientific Reports, while Asianet News Network says the study was accepted for publication there. No selected publisher discloses another news intermediary or independent verification.